New Covenant Theology and the 1644/1646 London Baptist Confession

There are some who choose to confess the 1646 London Baptist confession rather than the 1677 London Baptist confession. Their reasons for this choice vary, but among them are those who wish to adhere to what is known as “New Covenant Theology.” In making this move, it is claimed, they are identifying with Baptists who did not hold such a “rigid” stance on the law as it is expressed in the 1677 London Baptist confession. However, when examined in its historical context, there is no difference between the views of the early and later baptists concerning the law.

After the publication of the first confession in 1644, certain criticisms and inquiries were made to the Baptists concerning their positions on certain issues. In reply, they revised the confession and republished it in 1646. Benjamin Coxe, father of Nehemiah Coxe, also published an appendix to the confession in 1646 in order to give added clarity to some of the issues in question.

Benjamin Cox, Appendix Preface

Benjamin Cox, Appendix to the 1644, 7

Their stance on the law is quite clear, meaning that if one desires to adhere to New Covenant Theology and use the early Baptist confessions to do so, it can only be against the original beliefs of those who penned those confession. Granted, we are not forced to reproduce or emulate the precise views of our forefathers in every point, especially in matters not addressed by the confession. But the claim that the early Baptists held a lighter stance on the law is untenable.

Click the images for a larger version.

8 Responses to “New Covenant Theology and the 1644/1646 London Baptist Confession”

  1. Just came upon your blog and love it. Thanks for these excellent resources for Particular Baptist!

  2. I’m glad you’re enjoying it!

  3. Christian Says:

    Dear Friend,

    Please note, Coxe points out that “the gospel of Jesus Christ is a law, or commanding rule unto us.” These early Particular Baptists never redirected the Christian back to Moses to learn how to live – unlike their paedobaptist neighbors; they remained with Christ, which is what contemporary men like John Reisinger and Jon Zens has always advocated.

    Thanks for the site. Please keep up the good work of reviewing these old brethren to a new generation of Baptists.

  4. There is nothing in those statements that a NCT proponent would object to. The charge that NCTers support living without a rule is a misunderstanding. They wouldn’t claim that earlier Baptists held a lighter view on law. Merely, that it is not so stringently stressed as in the 1689.

  5. [...] Go to the Particular Voices blog to see this short writing from Benjamin Coxe. [...]

  6. [...] New Covenant Theology and the 1644/1646 London Baptist Confession [...]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 501 other followers

%d bloggers like this: